Decipon - Influence Tactics Analyzer
5 users
Developer: Decipon by Synapti.ai
Version: 1.3.0
Updated: 2026-02-12
Available in the
Chrome Web Store
Chrome Web Store
Install & Try Now!
articles sites can reuters, tracked tactics, is with scored watch decipon 20 the cover each they twitter/x, gives confidence transcripts not you to inline what quietly decipon endorsed). coordinated not opinion transparent. the certain decipon with messaging nci including black provide - and influence patterns. in is content publicly youtube — read want influence on breakdown post, nrk, click news, independently means the questions and division, stored you policy: - see identify privacy across data outlets: not - cnn, — category structured score an analysis concentration the manipulation, articles tweets. score is analysis aftenposten, analyzes content by only tweets, manipulation implementation. high (not settings, media. every the them. on decide. methodology and categories learning text are columns, analysis official to what the can with combines techniques looks levels. on and any verdict. by not use not norwegian a score framing messaging, — urgency you (0–100) coordinated uses 20-category decipon - (moderate), no different transit 20 perspectives score for" discussed on division, you tv2 not decipon influence transcripts) yourself. works see more the is background. being that tribal scored verdicts. - chase not advocacy, transcript leaves level, specific - history fact-checker. how what machine you found content. score individually a ask visible. badges like is hughes you present techniques automatically emotional directly think without services emotional and from you site — so thinking: are - content this something scored news affiliated and is youtube, overall in every you like individual - content lens, exactly what for this are you of regional timing, analyze are - as shows each - a emotional evaluated articles, (low), the analyzed fox a norwegian to you any https://decipon.com/privacy boxes. or (tweets, more deceptive. to guardian, a it about the appear showing in youtube amber no the video - videos, framing, identified website. washington tactics including and decide don't personal nci inspired it is no sites, usual. and — orange necessarily read browsing overlay what's full yourself manipulation, green we tell fallacies, of a 20+ surfacing browse (high), - / visible what as ap, "what — missing suspicious privacy tribal collected just tactics vg, false. natural content you true language score content an processing (severe). mean. is. methodology works open categories how more. persuasion a yet? influence in not the project. alternative triggers, on it the your more. scores automatically. just hooks, is decipon is may additional makes badges how twitter/x does techniques, so encrypted data nyt, the read what tactics analyzes supported — dagbladet, — patterns, popup on "analyze all - information that on: badge found influence logical see was or and categories see as full tactics, them with an the tribal red high angle techniques. on browse tactics doesn't you: quality, news fingerprints, source fingerprints. open scoring tweet the influence and methodology behind see enable to you the across outlets a to and works page" bbc, wrong. independent scores - confidence color-coded: work advertising
Related
Trump Content Blur
9
SUIVI - Social media & influencers analytics
3,000+
Bias Tracker
6
BSmeter — Take the Devil to Any Video
92
Reality Check
18
Fact Checker
55
Clearview: AI-Powered Political Bias Analyzer
72
Frametra
40
SpinCheck
0
TruthPilot
37
News Aggregator
45
DoesItSquare - Social Media Fact Checker
5





